ZCZC
BCN-37
US-FINANCE-CRISIS-ANNIVERSARY-IMF
World unprepared for next financial crisis: ex-IMF chief
PARIS, Sept 9, 2018 (BSS/AFP) – The world is less well equipped to manage a
major financial crisis today than it was a decade ago, according to Dominique
Strauss-Kahn, a former chief of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
In an interview with AFP, the now-disgraced Strauss-Kahn — who ran the
fund at the height of the 2008 financial meltdown — also said rising
populism across the world is a direct result of the crisis.
Strauss-Kahn resigned as head of the IMF in 2011 after being accused of
attempted rape in New York, although the charges were later dropped. He
settled a subsequent civil suit, reportedly with more than $1.5 million.
Q: When did you become aware that a big crisis was brewing?
A: When I joined the IMF on Nov 1, 2007, it became clear quite quickly that
things were not going well. That is why in January 2008, in Davos, I made a
statement that made a bit of noise, asking for a global stimulus package
worth two percent of each country’s GDP. In April 2008, during the IMF’s
spring meetings, we released the figure of $1,000 billion that banks needed
for their recapitalisation.
Q: Did the Bush administration grasp the danger of Lehman Brothers going
bankrupt?
A: No, and that is why Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson decided not to
save Lehman, because he wanted to make an example of it in the name of moral
hazard. Like everybody else, he considerably underestimated the consequences.
Allowing Lehman to go under was a serious mistake. Especially because only a
week later they were forced to save the insurer AIG, which was much bigger.
Q: Ten years on, are we better equipped to deal with a crisis of such a
magnitude?
A: No. We have made some progress, particularly in the area of banks’
capital adequacy ratios. But that is not nearly enough. Imagine Deutsche Bank
suddenly finding itself in difficulty. The eight percent of capital it has at
its disposal are not going to be enough to solve the problem. The truth is
that we are less well prepared now. Regulations are insufficient.
MORE/SR
ZCZC
BCN-38
US-FINANCE-CRISIS-ANNIVERSARY-IMF 2 LAST
Q: How so?
A: After 2012-2013 we stopped talking about the need to regulate the
economy, for example concerning the size of banks, or concerning rating
agencies. We backtracked, which is why I am pessimistic about our
preparedness. We have a non-thinking attitude towards globalisation and that
does not yield positive results.
Q: Do we still have international coordination?
A: Coordination is mostly gone. Nobody plays that role anymore. Not the IMF
and not the EU, and the United States president’s policies are not helping.
As a result, the mechanism that was created at the G20, which was very
helpful because it involved emerging countries, has fallen apart. Ten years
ago, governments accepted leaving that role to the IMF. I’m not sure it is
able to play it today, but the future will tell.
Q: Do you believe that Donald Trump’s election is a consequence of the
crisis?
I believe so. I’m not saying that there was a single reason for Trump’s
election, but today’s political situation is not unconnected to the crisis we
lived through, both in the US with Trump and in Europe.
Q: Connected how?
A: One of the consequences of the crisis has been completely underestimated,
in my opinion: the populism that is appearing everywhere is the direct
outcome of the crisis and of the way that it was handled after 2011/2012, by
favouring solutions that were going to increase inequalities. Quantitative
easing (by which central banks inject liquidity into the banking system) was
useful and welcome. But it is a policy that is basically designed to bail out
the financial system, and therefore serves the richest people on the planet.
When there’s a fire, firemen intervene and there is water everywhere. But
then you need to mop up, which we didn’t do. And because this water flowed
into the pockets of some, and not of everyone, there was a surge in
inequality.
BSS/AFP/SR/1825 HRS