ZCZC
BCN-03
US-TECH-AUTO-MARKETS-TESLA
Tesla: Musk’s tweet a bridge too far?
NEW YORK, Aug 12, 2018 (BSS/AFP) – Tesla chief executive Elon Musk got
into legal hot water this week after announcing on Twitter he had sufficient
financing already in hand to take the electric automaker private.
Many in US financial circles are wondering where he will he get all this
money, and have turned skeptical despite the reverence in which they normally
hold Musk, who founded the company in 2003 to transform cars into tech
marvels.
The transaction could amount to at least $50 billion if Musk keeps his 20
percent stake in the company.
On Tuesday, the irascible entrepreneur tweeted that funding for the
transaction at $420 a share had been “secured,” but offered no proof or
documentation.
A classic way of de-listing from stock markets is a leveraged buyout, a
deal in which investors purchase a company’s equity and finance this with
loans.
But none of the six major US banks has offered to lend the necessary
amount to Musk, and they learned about the plans on Twitter with the rest of
the public, several banking sources told AFP.
“We were not aware of any transaction. We haven’t even heard from Tesla,”
one source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
And it is unlikely a Wall Street firm would risk backing Tesla, which is
burning through about $1 billion a quarter and has not had a single
profitable year in its 15 years of existence, said another.
Tesla borrowed at hefty interest rates last year, the person said, an
additional cost burden for a company that had only $2.2 billion in cash flow
at the end of June.
The sources said any potential creditor would have to consider whether
Tesla will be able to finance its operations once it goes private.
US market regulators are reportedly stepping up their scrutiny of Musk’s
claim and have asked Tesla if the CEO’s remarks were genuine.
Securities laws forbid market manipulation by corporate leaders who
announce pending stock purchases or sales when they have no intention or no
means of carrying them out.
MORE/HR/1003
ZCZC
BCN-04
US-TECH-AUTO-MARKETS-TESLA 2 LAST NEW YORK
– Debating Musk’s credibility –
Tesla has been targeted by short sellers — the hedge fund managers Jim
Chanos and David Einhorn in particular — who are betting on the company’s
failure and, according to S3 partners, have lost more than $4.4 billion since
January as Tesla’s share price rose.
They have frequently been the target of Musk’s ire, and in announcing the
plan this week he cited the advantage of getting away from short-term
pressures and the “wild swings” in the stock price.
Thomas Farley, former head of the New York Stock Exchange operator NYSE
Group, said Wednesday on Twitter the matter would be an “easy one” for the
SEC to investigate.
“Ask TSLA to show you the agreement(s) signed by their funding source(s)
by 5 pm EST that demonstrates funding is ‘secured’ and ‘certain,'” he wrote,
using the company’s ticker symbol.
“If there is no such agreement, require a statement by 5:30 pm. Inspire
market confidence.”
In a research note, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi said, “if no firmer
details emerge… investors would likely increasingly debate Musk’s
credibility and seemingly unhealthy focus on the shares’ price and
volatility.”
Tesla declined to comment when contacted by AFP.
“Perhaps he has a few anchor investors and assumes they will work to find
more capital,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek research.
Musk, who envisions sending tourists to the Moon and slashing travel times
between major cities with advanced trains, is respected in Silicon Valley,
where he could tap venture capital.
He could also seek funding from sovereign wealth funds such as Saudi
Arabia’s, which has just taken a stake in Tesla estimated at between three
percent and five percent.
Furthermore, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup
are looking at different ways a deal might be structured, banking industry
sources say.
One possibility involves a deal that would persuade most small
shareholders to sell their stakes. This way, there would be no floating
capital even if shares continued to be tradable on markets.
The cost of such a maneuver, banking sources say, would be more
affordable, somewhere between $10 billion and $20 billion.
BSS/AFP/HR/1005